jcpcftpp29
发表于 2012-7-20 11:17:59
it省略了。类似的句子有：He does not have a rich father, but depends on himself.
绚丽与否就不知道了，写出自己的风格就好。
关注我们广安
发表于 2012-7-20 12:24:05
已认真学习！
顶！
u0k9h6t8gp
发表于 2012-7-20 22:45:26
单凭楼主的锲而不舍，坚持不懈，表示很大的敬佩。十分同意次数不说明任何问题，只有付出了，有提高再去考，考出结果，才是正道。
弱问一个问题，A类和G类成绩，移民局都接受，对吧，鉴于楼主选择考试类别的建议。
jcpcftpp29
发表于 2012-7-21 03:47:54
A类G类的讨论坛子里已经有不少讨论了。两种移民局都接受，TX们肯定都选自己拿分高个去考 至于哪种自己可以得分高，或者更容易的问题，与小马过河的情形类似
本人自己的情况是：除了一鸭是G类，其余都是A类，因为觉得自己更适合后者。G类阅读貌似简单，却陷阱不少，而且同样分值允许错误的题数少于A类。就A类阅读来说，主题都是各个学科的研究，通过实验比较得出结论，这种思维方式比较适合理工科的学生。
就作文来说，G类小作文要求考生想象出一个场景，一种理由等等，实在不是填鸭式教育出来的楼主所长 再有，生活词汇的贫乏也是个问题。相对而言，A类的图表相对死板写，条理说清楚就可以。大作文两者相似，不过好像A类的评判更加严一些。
情况就是这样，哪种合适，自己选吧
lopyappeaph
发表于 2012-7-21 14:04:52
支持。不过“有经验的人”他们是否也有考写作7分的把握？
aasnj9048f
发表于 2012-7-22 00:57:18
我也是以老鸭，考了8次。。每次都是写作6.5，其他全是7和8。。。郁闷至极。。
jcpcftpp29
发表于 2012-7-22 03:55:37
这就靠个人甄别了。本人跟的老师是厦大英语系毕业，据其自己介绍，应聘的时候写过作文给考官阅卷（培训提供方是雅思考点），评价是8.5分。水平怎么样，一听课就知道了，这位老师还是很可以的。不过师傅领进门，修行靠个人。只有把学到的记住，还能正确地用出来，并且持续学习，不断进步才行，要不一个班下来，过7分的实在是稀有，这可能就是为什么很多人大骂骗人的原因。如果没上那个班，可能自己现在还在跟作文死磕，却不知道问题出在哪里。
jcpcftpp29
发表于 2012-7-22 11:05:07
除了报班，还有很多别的方式向有经验的人学习。有条件的可以找母语是英语的帮你改作文，最好是知道雅思规则的。没有认识的老外也可以找批改网站花点钱帮助批改。总之，方法是很多的，想想，总会有的。
jcpcftpp29
发表于 2012-7-22 22:01:43
握个手先。这种就差一口气的感觉确实让人奔溃，也只有过来人才能体会到。
jcpcftpp29
发表于 2012-7-23 02:42:35
再单独说说小作文吧，仅限A类。
给你个图表，怎样才能让人明白数据都说了些什么呢？分析数据背后的信息，最好一个信息一段。开头大略介绍一下图表里要说的内容，最后总结一下。一个大忌就是纯粹罗列数据而没有分析，数据只是为了支持信息用的。再有就是要注重比较，数据一比较，信息就一目了然了。
再给个例子，本人的一篇习作，希望能帮到你。
The table below shows the percentage of Australian households with access to computers or internet from 1998 to 2000.
Summarize the information by choosing and identifying the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | access to computer | access to internet |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Household income/year | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Below $50,000 per year | 34 | 33 | 37 | 10 | 12 | 21 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Above $50,000 per year| 69 | 71 | 77 | 34 | 43 | 57 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The data indicates how the ratio of Australian families who had access to computer and internet changed from 1998 to 2000. A comparison was made between households with lower income (below $50,000 per year) and those with higher income (above $50,000 each year).
It is manifestly clear from the data that throughout the given period, more Australian households could use personal computer and the internet, regardless of the level of their income. In 1998, only 34% of impoverished families and 69% of affluent ones could access to the computer, which witnessed a 3% and 8% increase respectively two years later. Similarly, such a rise happened to the access to internet, but more significantly, with 100% and 50% increase recorded.
Interestingly, between the years 1998 and 1999, the percentage of families with computer access did not change considerably. It dropped by 1% for deprived families, and increased only by 2% for wealthy ones.
In conclusion, more families in Australia were able to use computer and internet from 1998 to 2000, no matter what the economic condition they were in. And it appeared that the growth of internet use outweighed that of the computer.
[]