澳洲同城网

标题: 再发大作文一篇,求高手点评! [打印本页]

作者: dsafsf    时间: 2010-12-27 19:16
标题: 再发大作文一篇,求高手点评!


练习了一段时间,感觉速度上有所提升,但是好像词汇量下来了,昨天又写了一篇,求高手点评!<br />
大家帮忙看看能得几分?<br />
感激不尽~~<br />
<br />
<br />
题目: Sending criminals to prison is not an effective way. Education and job training should be used instead. To what extend you agree or disagree?<br />
<br />
The problem of whether criminals should be sent into cell or just educated is not a new one. Although imprison them seems a bit brutal, given the choice, I suggest that all the culprits should be sent to prison to get the punishment.<br />
<br />
Restricting the freedom of the person who violated the law makes practical sense. First and foremost, it contributes to the social stability and safety. What is meant by this is that criminals are the ones who threat the society’s stable development. The freedom given to them may become the causes which make them revert to crime. Further, if offenders are just given education rather than punishment, it will surely cause a panic on citizens. It is suggested by the leading researchers in the field of sociology that there is a definite link between the incidence of crime and the punishment. Therefore, moderate penalty is necessary to deal with the high crime rate.<br />
<br />
Many people argue that criminals should get education or job training instead of be imprisoned. The reason is that these actions could help them get a decent job, which may give the culprits new opportunities to survive. However, what I want to argue is that those people who hold this idea may lay much more emphasis on criminals’ rights, they ignore the law abiding citizens’ rights.<br />
<br />
In conclusion, I strongly advocate that all the law breakers should be sent to prison or get more stringent punishment. In order to achieve a soundness surrounding for social development, it is necessary for law enforcement agencies to place greater emphasis on the impact of offensive on human welfare.




作者: 83smb3xsm0q    时间: 2010-12-27 23:01


词汇这样也已经算不错了。楼主写了一面倒的文章,支持句有点偏激,在支持观点的那段句子里的语气也很强硬。(从文章里感觉楼主对罪犯真是深恶痛绝啊)
个人认为,这篇文章结构合理,句式多样,不失为一篇好文章。就是语气太强硬了,有点带有感情色彩,我不知道这是不是会影响分数,看老外的范文基本都是打太极,就算是支持某观点也是用would,could,should等客气语气。



作者: dsafsf    时间: 2010-12-28 00:05


感谢!
再看一遍,似乎是存在这样的问题。也许像strongly,all,这样的词可以再修改一下,让语气平和一些。



作者: 弹涂鱼统一外    时间: 2010-12-28 05:27


Further, if offenders are just given education rather than punishment, it will surely cause a panic on citizens. It is suggested by the leading researchers in the field of sociology that there is a definite link between the incidence of crime and the punishment.

第二句和第一句有逻辑上的问题, 应该第一句完了以后展开讲 panic of the citizen. 但是又不太好讲, 接上一句讲犯罪率和惩罚有关系,但是跟panic有啥关系????

这两句意思搭不上

最理想的是讲 只是教育是不是会引起犯罪率的上升, 因为不用坐牢,大家都去犯罪, 这样整个社会就不会稳定....



作者: dsafsf    时间: 2010-12-28 11:44


我是想说如果犯罪者都不需要坐牢,那么犯罪的人会越来越多,这样,市民就会感到恐慌。。只是写完这句感觉词儿应该够了,就把后面要写的给忘了,现在看起来是有些奇怪,呵呵



作者: nuttArexire    时间: 2010-12-28 15:00


稳妥起见,还是打打太极比较好,最好还是留一段论述,把犯人关起来同时也需要关注如何让他们得到起码的谋生能力放出去以后可以正常返回社会之类。不然逻辑上终究有点站不住脚,即使单看中文也过于极端。

原题观点的最大缺陷是instead这个词,区区250多字集中火力轰炸即可,不如开篇就说:教育肯定是需要的,可以先关起来再教育么……



作者: gzkvzzopsa    时间: 2010-12-29 02:22


同样的文章我在
http://www.localau.com/thread-935612-1-2.html
15楼,也写过一篇,LZ有兴趣可以看看,欢迎评论。



作者: 不想再想09    时间: 2010-12-29 11:07




老外写类似的学术文章,特别讲究写法上要tentative, 就是:尽量不要用will, absolutely, all,every 之类的词汇;尽量使用probably,mostly,could, would,甚至almost every/all都行等,不然可能要被扣分的。







欢迎光临 澳洲同城网 (https://www.tongchengau.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.2