临场写作那篇比这个差很多，哥们反映稍慢，往往要一两个小时才能构思一篇，临场总是慌乱。<br />
<br />
question：Tourism can be an excellent way for a country to develop but also cause harm. How can we ensure the continue development of the tourism.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Tourism might play an important role in a country’s economy. For example, employment can be provided and local incomes can be increased. Nevertheless, negative influence such as environmental pollution, eco-disaster can be drawbacks of tourism, which sooner or later will limit the sustainability of tourism. For the continued development of tourism in one country, two major aspects should be considered. <br />
<br />
First, pollution should be forbidden by strict laws that are provided by the government. When the tourism thrives, the consumption of more and more tourists will exceed the burden of the environment. It is more likely to cause pollution as increasing wastes that are produced by overcrowded human. So, the annual tourist population, for instance, must be limited within a reasonable number. Any company or department who ignore the regulation should be punished by the law. Also, firing or any behavior which might cause serious eco-disasters should be prohibited by laws. <br />
<br />
In addition, organizations and schools have the obligation of educating both tourists and local residents to consciously cherish the tourism resources. In many circumstances, people do not intend to but their activities indeed ruin the natural resources, or break the eco-balance of the nature, even cause drastic disaster for the local fragile eco-system. A supporting example can be found with the coral reef. As a constant tourism development in the Great Barrier Reef Australia, the coral reefs are dying out an increasing speed, which would consequently harm the fish and other marine creatures. Tourists should be taught reasonable behavior, such as not touching the corals, not feeding fish underwater, not moving anything on the seabed and so forth, to keep the eco balance. These can not be regulated by the law, but can be achieved by the continuing education and campaign.<br />
<br />
In sum, the tourism can be sustainable only if the resources it relies on can be sustainable. Therefore, laws along with the education and campaign which protect the tourism resources might afford a country’s tourism to be continued for generations.
作者: a2ozc06ejx 时间: 2011-2-15 14:42
如果真能像写blog一样每天一片，祈祷3个月，拿下7分
Question: Some people think we need more female leaders to create world peace and reduce violence. To what extent do you agree.
Some of the public believe that the achievements of world peace and violence reduction need the participation of more female leaders. I agree with this viewpoint to some extent when female leaders do play growing significant roles in the world affairs. However, the relationship between population of female leaders and the possibility of problem solving might not be so certain. In another words, increasing female leaders is not the key for the problem,
Admittedly, more and more females have devoted themselves into activities of creating peace or reducing violence in recent decades. Some at the top ranging from politic leaders to public image ambassadors have made particularly evident contributions. Diana, princess of Wills, was an excellent model of women in the campaign of world peace and combat of poverty. Angelina Jolie, the famous Hollywood actress, is working on the propaganda of fighting racial violent conflict in Africa. With all the efforts of these outstanding leading females, the public are becoming increasingly sensitive to the people in the war and are rejecting the violent activities on national, racial, ethnic and domestic levels.
However, the goals world peace and none violence might not be achieved so easily as more female leaders take part in. Instead of the population of female leaders, the equality of genders is likely to be more essential to be considered. As we probably know that gender discrimination still exists in many countries. Females are treated as humble persons, even are trafficked illegally. Females in these countries are often illiteracies and are living in threatening condition, let alone the possibility of being elected leaders. Therefore, to make a peaceful world without violence, it is more essentially to give all common females justice in society first rather than to make a few female leaders.
In the final of this essay, though I appreciate that more female leaders become significantly important in the process of world peace or against violence, to pursue the true liberty of human being and to make a peaceful planet, there are more importantly considerable issues than just increasing the population of female leaders.
[]
作者: rrqk9295 时间: 2011-2-15 19:29
lz加油，共勉！
作者: 路口转弯 时间: 2011-2-16 02:08
加油
作者: a2ozc06ejx 时间: 2011-2-16 12:24
Third essay
Question: Students from rural area often find it difficult to access to university education, so people think universities should make it specially easy for them to study at. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
The problem that students from rural area often have less chance to go to university is serious. However, the measure that universities offer easier way or lower standard for them to study at is unlikely to solve this problem effectively.
First, the real reason that the students are difficult to go to university is their weak conditions compared to peers in cities. So an effective solution is to help them to improve their conditions in aspects such as poor schooling conditions, limited information, lack of instruction and guidance to apply for universities. The government should invest more money to the primary education, the secondary education and the high school education in rural area. The fair educational environment, teachers, learning contents and training processes should be ensured in rural area as same quality as they are in cities. Then, students in rural area can have the same opportunities in the competition.
More importantly, the suggestion that set lower standards of access to universities for students in rural area can generate unfairness in the competition along with the corruption in social departments. Inarguably, university education is base on the belief that all students are treated equally despite of racial, national or economical background. So nobody can have the privilege to get the specially easy treatment. On the contrary, as we all know, it is the rich and powerful people that might afford to use this “privilege” to benefit their own children. They can change their identities from city dwellers into rural area citizens when their children are going to apply to universities. In this circumstance, the corruption might have an increasing rate in both the educational department and the demographic department.
Admittedly, because of the lower income families in rural area often have, it is the obligation of universities to offer more financial support to students in those families. With the aid, such as scholarship or assistantship, students in rural area can afford to go to university easily, which should be encouraged to universities. This kind of measures is not the same issue as the suggestion what simply “make it specially easy”.
In sum, though, the universities should be encouraged to set up numerous financial measures to support poor students from rural area, it is not reasonable that the universities offer easy access to enter for them. In fact, the unfair treatment might cause seriously adverse impact to the university education itself and might not help the students at all.
The problem that students from rural area often have less chance to go to university is serious （The problem is so serious that ~~~）. However, the measure that universities offer easier way or lower standard for them to study at is unlikely to solve this problem effectively.
First, the real reason that the students are difficult to go to university is their weak conditions compared to peers in cities. So an effective solution is to help them to improve their conditions in aspects such as poor schooling conditions, limited information, lack of instruction and guidance to apply for universities. The government should invest more money to the primary education, the secondary education and the high school education in rural area. The fair educational environment, teachers, learning contents and training processes should be ensured in rural area as same quality as they are in cities. Then, students in rural area can have the same opportunities in the competition.
More importantly, the suggestion that set lower standards of access to universities for students in rural area can generate unfairness in the competition along with the corruption in social departments. Inarguably, university education is base on the belief that all students are treated equally despite of racial, national or economical background. So nobody can have the privilege to get the specially easy treatment. On the contrary, as we all know, it is the rich and powerful people that might afford to use this “privilege” to benefit their own children. They can change their identities from city dwellers into rural area citizens when their children are going to apply to universities. In this circumstance, the corruption might have an increasing rate in both the educational department and the demographic department.
Admittedly, because of the lower income families in rural area often have, it is the obligation of universities to offer more financial support to students in those families. With the aid, such as scholarship or assistantship, students in rural area can afford to go to university easily, which should be encouraged to universities. This kind of measures is not the same issue as the suggestion what simply “make it specially easy”.
In sum, though, the universities should be encouraged to set up numerous financial measures to support poor students from rural area, （and） it is not reasonable that the universities offer easy access to enter for them. In fact, the unfair treatment might cause seriously adverse impact to the university education itself and might not help the students at all.