<br />
<br />
<strong>【ACS】</strong>ACS在5月新result格式变化以来 终于在昨天官网特意更新说明了这个变化：<br />
<br />
<strong> 不过大意都在围绕ACS自己怎么定义skilled employment，说这个‘after Date'是满足了ACS对于Skilled employment的定义要求，只有该日期以后的工作经验才被认为是Skilled employment，ACS只字未提这个会如何影响你在EOI里面claim分数，也就是说DIAC对于一个提交ACS新Result letter格式的申请人 DIAC如何看待认可计算你的工作经验 如果你不按照ACS说的skilled employment来claim工作经验，DIAC会不会给你判定overClaim甚至拒签 DIAC的态度 目前还是不明朗<br />
</strong><br />
<br />
https://www.acs.org.au/migration ... nt/news-and-updates<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>News & Updates</strong><br />
<br />
<strong>ACS Skill Assessment Result Letters </strong><br />
<br />
All ACS Skill Assessment Result Letters report on a date (mm/yy) of when an applicant becomes ‘skilled’.<br />
This date will be when the applicant meets the ACS Requirements, these requirements are detailed in the Summary of Criteria <br />
Please note, only employment completed after the date the applicant has met the ACS requirements will be counted as skilled employment.<br />
<br />
<strong>个人分析：</strong><br />
不少人联系ACS，ACS给他们答复说Result letter格式的变化 实际上是DIAC暗中让ACS做的，但是DIAC自己的官网却没有任何相关的政策变动和说明。<br />
估测，只是估测，仅供参考，比较有可能的是即将到来的7.1新政和配额，会稍微收紧IT的关口，DIAC只要稍微出台一下说只承认Skilled employment才能claim为工作经验分，那么结合ACS的新result letter，大却大部分的IT申请人至少会工作经验砍掉2年或者以上。 ACS的result letter对于DIAC来说只是一个意见，具体还是要看DIAC怎么弄，他们才是生死判官。
你说对了，但是移民局对于怎样认定skilled，是要参照职业描述的门槛的。
至今为止，移民局描述的，计算机行业的职业的门槛基本还是本科及以上学历，并没有附加两年，所以矛盾在这里！描述里只有模糊地说，In some instances relevant experience and/or on-the-job training may be required in addition to the formal qualification (ANZSCO Skill Level 1)。至于是哪些情况下要求，没有说清，的确是让人非常confused.
SKILL LEVEL不够，用VENDOR CERT补也好还是用5年补也好，是SKILL LEVEL的要求。现在ACS改了，说达到summary of criteria以后才算SKILLED，是SKILLED EMPLOYMENT的要求。这两个要求应该是AND的关系，不是OR。
作者: cc2l2l6k6 时间: 2013-6-10 09:10
22.1 When is an applicant skilled
Skilled on basis of educational qualifications
An applicant is taken to be capable of undertaking work at a skilled level only after they have met the entry level requirements for that occupation.
If the entry level prescribed for the applicant’s nominated occupation is a certain qualification only work undertaken after the applicant has completed that qualification will be counted as skilled employment.
是有这么回事。。。但是。。。
22 Employment must be skilled
For employment to be considered ‘skilled’ it must meet two requirements:
1.that it was undertaken after the applicant met the entry level requirements for that occupation (that is, completed a sufficient level of study or amount of on-the-job training) and
2.that it involved duties at the level of depth and complexity expected in Australia.
In assessing both factors, case officers should have regard to ANZSCO. For occupations for which ANZSCO does not provide adequate guidance, case officers should consider the requirements set by the relevant assessing authority.
还有。。。
22.2 Skilled after on the job training
The three main occupations for which on the job training can be used to obtain a suitable skills assessment are the trades, management positions and IT professionals.
As these applicants do not have an identifiable date of registration or completion of their formal studies, the assessing body will normally prescribe a date as of which the applicant is assessed as meeting the Australian standard for the occupation.
If this date has not been identified by the assessing authority, a case officer should have regard to ANZSCO in the first instance or where ANZSCO is silent, the guidelines used by the relevant assessing authority, to determine how long a person would need to work in that occupation before they would be considered to meet the Australian entry level requirement.
22 Employment must be skilled
For employment to be considered ‘skilled’ it must meet two requirements:
1.that it was undertaken after the applicant met the entry level requirements for that occupation (that is, completed a sufficient level of study or amount of on-the-job training) and
In assessing both factors, case officers should have regard to ANZSCO.
=====>这里针对 ANZSCO does not provide adequate guidance：
大部分的ICT Occupation Code在ANZSCO描述里提供了guidance:
Australian Skills Recognition Information (ASRI) http://www.immi.gov.au/asri/
举例 261313 software-engineer http://www.immi.gov.au/asri/occupations/s/software-engineer.htm
Skill level
This occupation has a level of skill commensurate with a bachelor degree or higher qualification. <--Formal qualification
At least five years of relevant experience may substitute for the formal qualification.<--如果没有Formal qualification, 如何替代
In some instances relevant experience and/or on-the-job training may be required in addition to the formal qualification (ANZSCO Skill Level 1). <--某些情况下，光Formal qualification还不够，Like SummitLegal 所说，这里什么是some instances某些情况下，不清楚，不过这个应该属于个别案例CO的不同处理，不是针对群体所有。
22.2 Skilled after on the job training
The three main occupations for which on the job training can be used to obtain a suitable skills assessment are the trades, management positions and
If this date has not been identified by the assessing authority, a case officer should have regard to ANZSCO in the first instance or where ANZSCO is silent, the guidelines used by the relevant assessing authority, to determine how long a person would need to work in that occupation before they would be considered to meet the Australian entry level requirement.
所以目前很不乐观。
======>这里针对标题 22.2 Skilled after on the job training：
通过on-the-job training来获得skilled，也可以是属于前面说的'some instances'。 另外好像也是特别针对于那些通过RPL方式职业评估的应征者。 也就是下列二种情况申请人：
1）RPL申请人 - 就是说申请人的学历学位可能不是ICT major或者没有Formal qualification，通过其他方式来代替的
2) 在'Some instances'范畴里的申请人 - 这部分人可能拥有Formal qualification，但是还是被要求‘relevant experience’ and/or ‘on-the-job training’，不过应该属于个案申请人，不是所有群体
<======
22 Employment must be skilled
For employment to be considered ‘skilled’ it must meet two requirements:
1.that it was undertaken after the applicant met the entry level requirements for that occupation (that is, completed a sufficient level of study or amount of on-the-job training) and
2.that it involved duties at the level of depth and complexity expected in Australia.
In assessing both factors, case officers should have regard to ANZSCO. For occupations for which ANZSCO does not provide adequate guidance, case officers should consider the requirements set by the relevant assessing authority.