公告:为给大家更好的使用体验,同城网今日将系统升级,页面可能会出现不稳定状态,由此给您带来的不便,敬请谅解!
升级时间:2016-7-24 11:00 -- 2016-7-24 15:00

澳洲同城网

查看: 5713|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[雅思杂谈] 有没有高手来看看我的作文~求指导

[复制链接]

153

主题

-2

金豆

25

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
25
金豆
-2
鲜花
0
主题
153
帖子
247
注册时间
2014-12-29
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-11-3 11:23:54 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式 来自: INNA

马上注册,结交更多同城好友,享用更多功能!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x


作文似乎进步不大,写了一篇在这里请大家帮忙指导。其实考了三次,每次都是6.5,但又不知道分数丢在哪里。

还请高人按照雅思评分标准在Task Response, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, Grammatical Range and Accuracy四个方面帮我打个分。

想知道弱点在哪里所以才可以进步。 多谢各位帮忙。



作文是写在标准答题纸上的,用了刚好40分钟。



Task: Some people think that the large amounts of time and money spent on the protection of wild animals should be spent on the human population instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?





In the contemporary world, human activities increasingly pose a great threat to the endangered species. International organizations and local governments have spent sizeable money to protect those wild animals that facing extinction. Opponents, however, claim that the precious budget should be invested in human population instead.



Indeed, the poor need money and help from the rich. Those people lived in poverty face incredibly harsh living standards including scarcity of food, shortage of water, and lack of basic medical attention. What is needed, therefore, is the assistance from charities and developed countries. Without the adequate financial supports, 10 percent of the world population would struggle for living on this planet.



However, money cannot address all the problems the impoverished people have. Specifically, what we as human beings differentiate from wild animals is that people have the power of creativity that contributes to the substantial achievement of human history. The poor, nevertheless, without money, can also make significant change on their living conditions by their innovations and endeavors. On the other hand, wild animals are different since they do not have the exceptional abilities we have. Without the preservation and protection from us, disappearing from our scenery plant they used to survive and thrive is the only destination they can imagine. In this respect, the demand of help to wild animals is more important than that to human population.



Furthermore, what supports the sustainable development of current society is the balance of the ecological system. The endangered species as well as other wild animals are undoubtedly indispensible parts of the system that has run for thousands of years with the harmony of human and animals. Unfortunately, the industrialized world has brought irreversible damage to our friends, the animals, in the past decades, and what we can forecast is the ramp down of the eco-system if the tendency continues. Consequently, there will not be sufficient natural resources, served by the eco-system, for us to consume before we are consumed by death.



In conclusion, although the poor need money to help, the wild animals are already standing on the top of the cliff. The investment to be spent on the preservation of endangered species should have a larger proportion then that for the human population. Specifically, we, human beings, need to have a collective consciousness to preserve those endangered species for the sake of them and for the sake of us.



[]



免责声明
澳洲同城网是一个免费的公共信息平台,网站内容由网友自由发布,发布者拥有所发布信息的版权同时承担相应责任; 若所发布信息侵犯了您的权利,请反馈给澳洲同城网,我们核实后将进行相应处理!
官方微信公众号
澳洲同城网官方公众号
微信上也能找工作,找房子?关注万能的同城网官方公众号 localsyd,找到你找不到!
回复

使用道具 举报

166

主题

7

金豆

26

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
26
金豆
7
鲜花
0
主题
166
帖子
261
注册时间
2015-2-18
沙发
发表于 2011-11-3 20:17:49 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA


我觉得你遣词造句还是很厉害的。我之前也专门学过一阵怎么写好词好句的,但自己写的时候经常跳出来的还是最简单的句型和词语,有时候还常常觉得词不达意,没法表达清楚自己的意思。

后面,我试着说说我的体会,说的不对的地方就直接忽略吧~~。我觉得写作6.5到7的距离,很大程度上是思路和逻辑的问题,所以审题正确,论述切题也很重要。比方说,这道题目的争论点是:应该花钱保护动物还是人类。钱是有限的,所以这里应该是钱优先保护谁的问题。

我理解了一下你主体段三段的主要意思是:
1. 世界上确实有很多穷人,他们缺衣少食,缺少最基本的生活保障。
2.人和动物的区别是人有创造力。动物没有创造力,所以如果人类不保护他们,动物就会死掉。人有创造性,所以穷人就算没钱,也能活下去。因此,要优先保护动物。
3.保护动物是保护生态平衡,生态平衡了人类才能生存。所以优先保护动物。

这三段里面,只有第三段支持了你的全文观点”要优先保护动物“。第二段,觉得没有说服力哎。第一段,完全是反的,推出的结论是,”人都快饿死了,怎么还先保护动物?“。

我建议,先把中文的思路理顺了,再写一遍这篇作文。我觉得逻辑通顺了,按照你的英文水平,一定能考到7分以上的。


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

152

主题

9

金豆

28

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
28
金豆
9
鲜花
0
主题
152
帖子
282
注册时间
2014-12-8
板凳
发表于 2011-11-3 22:31:24 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA


In the contemporary world, human activities increasingly pose a great threat to the endangered species. International organizations and local governments have spent sizeable money to protect those wild animals that facing extinction. Opponents, however, claim that the precious budget should be invested in human population instead.
最前面四个字不用写,句子的时态就可以表示了。第二句,觉得写成human activities pose an increasing threat比较合适。 wild animals that are facing extinction,少了一个are. budget一般不用precious修饰,可以用remarkable或者considerable,或者enormous。
总结第一段,背景介绍于题目关系不大,题目并没有说人和动物之间的因果关系,所以这样的背景有点离题。点题倒是做到的,不过rephrase的空间还比较大,比如全部句子只是用invest替代了spent,其他都没有变化,可能不是好迹象,个人猜测。

Indeed, the poor need money and help from the rich. Those people lived in poverty face incredibly harsh living standards including scarcity of food, shortage of water, and lack of basic medical attention. What is needed, therefore, is the assistance from charities and developed countries. Without the adequate financial supports, 10 percent of the world population would struggle for living on this planet.
文章并没有说把钱给穷人花,而且用在人类而非动物,所以有点偏题。你可以说,人类有哪些东西是急需花钱的,为什么,会起到什么作用。所以写穷人就digress了。
语法方面,those people who live,建议不要用incredibly,可以改用extremely或者terribly等。living standard和food,water等不构成对等关系,所以建议把standards改成problems就可以了。developed countries前面加the.
adequate前面不用加the。

However, money cannot address all the problems the impoverished people have. Specifically, what we as human beings differentiate from wild animals is that people have the power of creativity that contributes to the substantial achievement of human history. The poor, nevertheless, without money, can also make significant change on their living conditions by their innovations and endeavors. On the other hand, wild animals are different since they do not have the exceptional abilities we have. Without the preservation and protection from us, disappearing from our scenery plant they used to survive and thrive is the only destination they can imagine. In this respect, the demand of help to wild animals is more important than that to human population.
这段还是偏题,此外语法方面differentiate是及物动物vt,所以这里貌似应该用differ。exceptional不知道啥意思,不过我知道这里用equal会比较合适。preservation和protection有点redundant。imagine不能修饰destination吧,可以改成head for或者destiny they have。

Furthermore, what supports the sustainable development of current society is the balance of the ecological system. The endangered species as well as other wild animals are undoubtedly indispensible parts of the system that has run for thousands of years with the harmony of human and animals. Unfortunately, the industrialized world has brought irreversible damage to our friends, the animals, in the past decades, and what we can forecast is the ramp down of the eco-system if the tendency continues. Consequently, there will not be sufficient natural resources, served by the eco-system, for us to consume before we are consumed by death.
with the harmony of是不是应该是in the harmony between。serverd?还是provided?
before we are consumed by death没有看懂。
In conclusion, although the poor need money to help, the wild animals are already standing on the top of the cliff. The investment to be spent on the preservation of endangered species should have a larger proportion then that for the human population. Specifically, we, human beings, need to have a collective consciousness to preserve those endangered species for the sake of them and for the sake of us.
最后一段不分析了,有点混乱,我有点混乱,不是你。

所以从4个角度来评定,分数肯定受影响。
建议,首先读懂题目,想好内容,构思好文章再动笔。
你的词汇没有问题,句型的使用会有一些不自然,当然我也好不到哪里去。
语法会有一些错误,单词的选择上面也会有一些问题。

不过最重要的还是不要偏题,否则真的就完蛋了。


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

164

主题

4

金豆

27

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
27
金豆
4
鲜花
0
主题
164
帖子
270
注册时间
2014-8-28
地板
发表于 2011-11-4 05:53:29 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA


Task: Some people think that the large amounts of time and money spent on the protection of wild animals should be spent on the human population instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

个人建议这样弄:
开头一段,介绍背景加点题,可以表明你的观点,或者到结尾再表明观点。
所以第一句可以写,动物需要花钱,人也需要花钱,这个就难办了。
有人说(开始点题了),应该先保证人类的发展,(而不因过分关注动物的死活)
你的观点是啥?

第二段,人有哪些方面需要花钱的,比如发展农业,来满足70亿人口;比如发展经济,来提高生活水平;比如,发展医疗来应对各类棘手的疾病;比如……想好自己需要写啥,一个观点加3-5句话来支撑,才能达到fully developed的程度。

第三段,动物为啥需要花钱,比如保证生态环境,确保物种的多样性;比如,我们和动物共享一个地球,动物的环境好了,人类的环境也会随之改变;比如动物有很多值得我们学习,可以利于人类的地方,保护动物,人类也会受益等。

第四段,总结,所以,你的观点是个啥,简单重申下支撑点,如果需要凑字数,就再展望下未来之类的。


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

141

主题

6

金豆

24

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
24
金豆
6
鲜花
0
主题
141
帖子
244
注册时间
2015-2-25
5#
发表于 2011-11-4 16:03:40 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA


我觉得这个是个典型的可以用分类法来解的题目:

第一段不写了;

第二段:对于穷国来说,他们的首要目的肯定是发展好本国经济,满足温饱先。如果不先满足好本国人民的温饱基本问题,那么去投资保护动物是荒谬的,而且会导致两边都没发展好。

第三段:对于富国来说,由于经过了一段时间的工业发展,动物多样性在一定程度上遭到破坏,如果不在这个时候投资动物保护,那么会导致不可持续发展。 It is well known that 1. 2. 3. 距离论证;

第四段:所以,保护动物是天经地义的,however,这个没有一个 definite answer on this arguement, it depends on ...... thus,......

楼主的功底浑厚,就是句子有点复杂,读起来蛮吃力的。不要把优势变成劣势。

6.5 到 7 确实是论证和逻辑连接这块了。老外喜欢具体和逻辑,中国人喜欢飘忽和领悟这种领导哲学。所以我们学起来累。


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则




外汇平台
金牌家政
汽车网



















wuliu
你想了解我们吗?
联系我们
关注我们
官方微博 官方Facebook 官方Twitter
微信关注
官方微信公众号 官方微信服务号
官方公众号 客服微信
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表