公告:为给大家更好的使用体验,同城网今日将系统升级,页面可能会出现不稳定状态,由此给您带来的不便,敬请谅解!
升级时间:2016-7-24 11:00 -- 2016-7-24 15:00

澳洲同城网

查看: 6317|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[雅思杂谈] 作文,请高手指点,谢谢

[复制链接]

142

主题

-2

金豆

26

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
26
金豆
-2
鲜花
0
主题
142
帖子
258
注册时间
2014-9-1
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-5-12 20:00:42 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式 来自: INNA

马上注册,结交更多同城好友,享用更多功能!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x


Some people think that teaching children of different abilities together benefits everyone. Others believe that intelligent children should be taught separately and given special treatment. Discuss both sides of view and give you own opinion.



The variety of children with different level of intelligence and ability in one class pose a debate about the way of teaching. Smart children with good family education can be taught with higher lever of knowledge. Other children who are less intelligent should be taught patiently. By what means a teacher can cater these two sorts of children?



Some people think the best way to teach all the children well is to separate intelligent children from the rest. Each kind of children can be taught by different ways based on children's different background. And both smart children and less intelligent children can learn efficiently. Smart children will learn quickly and get more knowledge. The rest of children can also master what they are taught by ways of teaching that suit them.



Other people oppose to separate children. They think both sorts of children will be damaged. Firstly, the children who are deemed less intelligent will feel upset and discouraged. This separation will cause the feeling of children’s inferiority which retards the development of their own. Secondly, the smart children can not benefit from the separation even they can be treated specially. Perhaps those smart children can learn more knowledge. However, the education can not be only inputting knowledge of science into children's mind. Children should learn more at school. Children should learn to handle the relationship with various people, including children less intelligence, which will help them to fit the complicated society when they grow up. Moreover, every child regardless of his intelligence has his own merit. A smart child can also learn much from a child which is not as smart as him.



Children should live in the environment of variety. Keeping smart children from the rest will lead to damage on all children.



免责声明
澳洲同城网是一个免费的公共信息平台,网站内容由网友自由发布,发布者拥有所发布信息的版权同时承担相应责任; 若所发布信息侵犯了您的权利,请反馈给澳洲同城网,我们核实后将进行相应处理!
官方微信公众号
澳洲同城网官方公众号
微信上也能找工作,找房子?关注万能的同城网官方公众号 localsyd,找到你找不到!
回复

使用道具 举报

147

主题

1

金豆

24

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
24
金豆
1
鲜花
0
主题
147
帖子
238
注册时间
2014-9-27
沙发
发表于 2010-5-13 07:50:56 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA


我不是高手,不过我很有空~~看了一下你的作文
感觉思路很清楚啊,可能是高分


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

135

主题

4

金豆

24

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
24
金豆
4
鲜花
0
主题
135
帖子
237
注册时间
2015-3-3
板凳
发表于 2010-5-13 18:51:34 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA


The variety of children with different level of intelligence and ability in one class pose a debate about the way of teaching. Smart children with good family education can be taught with higher lever (level)of knowledge. Other children who are less intelligent should be taught patiently.(??) By what means a teacher can (can是否应该在a teacher前?)cater these two sorts of children?
Some people think the best way to teach all the children well is to separate intelligent children from the rest. Each kind of children can be taught by different ways based on children's different background. And (应该用,and..吧?)both smart children and less intelligent children can learn efficiently. Smart children will learn quickly and get more knowledge. The rest of children can also master what they are taught by ways of teaching that suit them.


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

158

主题

0

金豆

27

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
27
金豆
0
鲜花
0
主题
158
帖子
266
注册时间
2015-1-28
地板
发表于 2010-5-14 05:10:05 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA


简单评下,  children 出现的太多, 同义替换下,  youngsters,  teenagers, adolescents, youths, 等等


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

156

主题

3

金豆

25

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
25
金豆
3
鲜花
0
主题
156
帖子
251
注册时间
2015-1-19
5#
发表于 2010-5-14 05:49:32 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA


1. different level 和different background我认为都应该是复数different levels, different backgrounds
2.是cater for不是cater?
3.Other people oppose to separate children, 是不是应该改成other ppl oppose the sepration of children into different groups,用名词?
4.They think both sorts of children will be damaged,这个damage用的有点恐怖,不至于
5.the children who are deemed less intelligent will feel upset and discouraged. will用的欠缺点,我觉得would更好,下面有几处也是
6.This separation will cause the feeling of children’s inferiority which retards the development of their own. 试着改改, this separation would cause feelings of inferiority (or make children feel inferiority), which is likely to retard children's (their) development.
6. which will help them to fit the complicated society, 加个in 感觉更好fit in the society
7.A smart child can also learn much from a child which is not as smart as him. 改为a child who is not as smart as him?


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

138

主题

-5

金豆

22

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
22
金豆
-5
鲜花
0
主题
138
帖子
221
注册时间
2014-11-5
6#
发表于 2010-5-14 10:28:44 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA


做个记号,回头看,呵呵


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则




外汇平台
金牌家政
汽车网



















wuliu
你想了解我们吗?
联系我们
关注我们
官方微博 官方Facebook 官方Twitter
微信关注
官方微信公众号 官方微信服务号
官方公众号 客服微信
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表