公告:为给大家更好的使用体验,同城网今日将系统升级,页面可能会出现不稳定状态,由此给您带来的不便,敬请谅解!
升级时间:2016-7-24 11:00 -- 2016-7-24 15:00

澳洲同城网

查看: 4172|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[雅思杂谈] 大作文再求拍(3wu等人有空给看看)

[复制链接]

160

主题

12

金豆

25

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
25
金豆
12
鲜花
0
主题
160
帖子
250
注册时间
2014-10-15
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-9-19 20:45:16 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式 来自: INNA

马上注册,结交更多同城好友,享用更多功能!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x


It is wrong that our government pays more money to the artist projects, for instance, there are more and more paintings and sculptures appearing at the public places, because there are more important things to do. What is your opinion?

==========================================================================================================



It is common to see vast number of artificial projects like paintings as well as sculptures when people is wandering urban streets, and it has caused heated argument recently. Some people believe our government has invested too much in them, and there are some more important areas that are still weak and needs improvements with the investment. Personally, it is worthy to allocate appropriate proportion of overall governmental incomes to those artist projects.



There are multiple reasons why I believe that it is worthy to strengthen artificial items. Out of the multiple reasons, the obvious one should be that the artist items not only help improving the urban scenes, but also promote the cultural diversity. On the other hand, it also helps increasing the opportunities in job market since those projects need more human powers to fulfill. Last but not least, the artificial items might introduce more incomes for local authorities regarding the reality that the vast number of those items become tourist attractions. All the factors mentioned above are telling us that artificial projects are worthy for being invested in.



On the other hand, it is not denied that the minority of governments have spent too much on artist projects. According to a survey released recently, there are 10% of urban governments have allocated 20%, or even more of their overall incomes to those projects, that was regards as being inappropriate from my personal view since there are still more important areas, which are related to our daily life as well, needs more investments.



In conclusion, I do believe that it is worthy to put appropriate proportion of incomes to artist projects, but the governments also need think about other important areas like education, traffic system, social security etc. It might be the qualified development of society to have a balanced one.



免责声明
澳洲同城网是一个免费的公共信息平台,网站内容由网友自由发布,发布者拥有所发布信息的版权同时承担相应责任; 若所发布信息侵犯了您的权利,请反馈给澳洲同城网,我们核实后将进行相应处理!
官方微信公众号
澳洲同城网官方公众号
微信上也能找工作,找房子?关注万能的同城网官方公众号 localsyd,找到你找不到!
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则




外汇平台
金牌家政
汽车网



















wuliu
你想了解我们吗?
联系我们
关注我们
官方微博 官方Facebook 官方Twitter
微信关注
官方微信公众号 官方微信服务号
官方公众号 客服微信
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表