公告:为给大家更好的使用体验,同城网今日将系统升级,页面可能会出现不稳定状态,由此给您带来的不便,敬请谅解!
升级时间:2016-7-24 11:00 -- 2016-7-24 15:00

澳洲同城网

查看: 6251|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[雅思杂谈] 大作文,需要大家能给拍下

[复制链接]

134

主题

7

金豆

21

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
21
金豆
7
鲜花
0
主题
134
帖子
211
注册时间
2015-2-26
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-9-15 14:37:46 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式 来自: INNA

马上注册,结交更多同城好友,享用更多功能!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x


localau上高手如云哦,大家有空给来拍一下啊

================================================================================

Universities do not prepare people for work.Instead, they teach knowledge that has little relevance in "the real word".How far do you agree or disagree? Give reason for your answers.

=================================================================



It is quit common to see that huge proportion of employees, who already had multiple years' working experiences, are complaining that the universities they graduated from did not teach them much factual knowledges or skills, and they also feel not satisfied with that the universities focus on basic theories too much.



As shown from recently released survey, much experienced people believe their universities should have helped them gaining practical knowledges or skills, that can be applied to their daily work directly. Particularly when those people are facing difficulties in front of new assignments, such kind of regret becomes more serious. However, I do not believe the blame should go to the universities after considering the major function of the academic institutes. The universities is the place where you can start yourself from a basis, instead of where you can gain everything, or even success.



Those who hold opposite opinion might argue that those basic theories taken from graduated universities are really important, or even crucial to help learning afterwards when they are working. Those theories become requisite foundations to understand the practical technologies, and grasp factual skills effectively and correctly. For hundreds of years, almost all breakthroughs of scientific theories are achieved from universities. What is meant by this is that the mostly powerful area of the universities is theory, and it is reasonable to focus more on it there. As well, scientific theories seems more difficult to grasp than factual knowledges, which is listed at another reason for young, energetic students to accomplish the task in universities. All of the factors mentioned demonstrate that universities should focus more on teaching scientific theories.



In conclusion, it is more convincing for universities to concentrate on teaching scientific theories instead of factual technologies and skills. As well, university education will be more faultless to adjust the theories they teach according to the alert of movement of 'the real world'.



免责声明
澳洲同城网是一个免费的公共信息平台,网站内容由网友自由发布,发布者拥有所发布信息的版权同时承担相应责任; 若所发布信息侵犯了您的权利,请反馈给澳洲同城网,我们核实后将进行相应处理!
官方微信公众号
澳洲同城网官方公众号
微信上也能找工作,找房子?关注万能的同城网官方公众号 localsyd,找到你找不到!
回复

使用道具 举报

153

主题

7

金豆

25

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
25
金豆
7
鲜花
0
主题
153
帖子
249
注册时间
2014-11-25
沙发
发表于 2010-9-16 00:17:57 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA


才看到这篇作文。
找到一点小毛病:
第二段,Particularly...和such kind...是两句话吧?没有连词。
第三段,focus on用了两次(或以上?第一段也用了focus on),能否换换表达方式?


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

153

主题

4

金豆

26

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
26
金豆
4
鲜花
0
主题
153
帖子
257
注册时间
2014-8-11
板凳
发表于 2010-9-16 07:46:22 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA


实在看LZ 写的惨不忍睹,我就略加提示: 抛开结构,观点, 语法的问题。就说你的审题。

题目问:“How far do you agree or disagree? Give reason for your answers.”

从你整篇文中,我能看到扣题目的只有下面红色部分:

It is quit common to see that huge proportion of employees, who already had multiple years' working experiences, are complaining that the universities they graduated from did not teach them much factual knowledges or skills, and they also feel not satisfied with that the universities focus on basic theories too much.

As shown from recently released survey, much experienced people believe their universities should have helped them gaining practical knowledges or skills, that can be applied to their daily work directly. Particularly when those people are facing difficulties in front of new assignments, such kind of regret becomes more serious. However, I do not believe the blame should go to the universities after considering the major function of the academic institutes. The universities is the place where you can start yourself from a basis, instead of where you can gain everything, or even success.

Those who hold opposite opinion might argue that those basic theories taken from graduated universities are really important, or even crucial to help learning afterwards when they are working. Those theories become requisite foundations to understand the practical technologies, and grasp factual skills effectively and correctly. For hundreds of years, almost all breakthroughs of scientific theories are achieved from universities. What is meant by this is that the mostly powerful area of the universities is theory, and it is reasonable to focus more on it there. As well, scientific theories seems more difficult to grasp than factual knowledges, which is listed at another reason for young, energetic students to accomplish the task in universities. All of the factors mentioned demonstrate that universities should focus more on teaching scientific theories.(勉强算是)

In conclusion, it is more convincing for universities to concentrate on teaching scientific theories instead of factual technologies and skills. As well, university education will be more faultless to adjust the theories they teach according to the alert of movement of 'the real world'.


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

134

主题

7

金豆

21

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
21
金豆
7
鲜花
0
主题
134
帖子
211
注册时间
2015-2-26
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-16 08:58:53 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA


谢谢w3u啊,果然是强人啊,看得好仔细。第二段最后一句,应该是"should not". 掉了个"not"


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

155

主题

3

金豆

26

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
26
金豆
3
鲜花
0
主题
155
帖子
258
注册时间
2014-10-20
5#
发表于 2010-9-16 10:28:28 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA


是不是应该把重点放在agree or disagree上面??。。。


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

134

主题

7

金豆

21

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
21
金豆
7
鲜花
0
主题
134
帖子
211
注册时间
2015-2-26
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-16 10:59:32 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA




谢谢w3c的建议啊,如果可以,不知道是否可以在结构,及語法方面给点建议啊


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

134

主题

7

金豆

21

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
21
金豆
7
鲜花
0
主题
134
帖子
211
注册时间
2015-2-26
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-16 22:26:12 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA




我想要达到的结构是:
第一段:引出问题
第二段:反面观点,然后加以反驳
第三段:正面观点,加以证明
最后一段总结一下


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

155

主题

-2

金豆

27

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
27
金豆
-2
鲜花
0
主题
155
帖子
271
注册时间
2015-4-8
8#
发表于 2010-9-17 09:50:06 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA


你这篇文章最明显的问题就是 问非所答。第一段就该直接回答 第一个问题,引出第二个回答。   反面正面都无所谓,这里的关键是,看不出是 “你”的 观点。这是才是核心问题。
第二段既然提出反对观点,那就要支持那个观点推开来例证,同一段内,你再提反对意见那就是自相矛盾。
第三段一开始就说“别人观点”。。。后面再例证,也都是离题。

关于结构: 建议你看看我在 新格咪咪 的帖子里提的关于文章结构的建议。


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

134

主题

7

金豆

21

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
21
金豆
7
鲜花
0
主题
134
帖子
211
注册时间
2015-2-26
9#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-17 12:12:04 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA




真是太感謝3WU了,分析得很在理。我再总结总结,然后再多加练习。多谢了!


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则




外汇平台
金牌家政
汽车网



















wuliu
你想了解我们吗?
联系我们
关注我们
官方微博 官方Facebook 官方Twitter
微信关注
官方微信公众号 官方微信服务号
官方公众号 客服微信
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表