公告:为给大家更好的使用体验,同城网今日将系统升级,页面可能会出现不稳定状态,由此给您带来的不便,敬请谅解!
升级时间:2016-7-24 11:00 -- 2016-7-24 15:00

澳洲同城网

查看: 5902|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[雅思杂谈] 拼凑作文一遍

[复制链接]

147

主题

5

金豆

24

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
24
金豆
5
鲜花
0
主题
147
帖子
244
注册时间
2014-8-16
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-5-24 10:28:46 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式 来自: INNA

马上注册,结交更多同城好友,享用更多功能!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x


第一次写作文,算不上写,拼凑一篇。肯定大家赐教。



Some people say that governments should pay for the public health care and education, while others say that it is not the government’s responsibility. Please discuss both views and give your own opinion.



There has been much discussion these years about whether authorities should have an obligation to pay for the public health care and education. In my opinion people who cannot afford it should be compensated by governments.



Some people argue that governments have responsibility to fund the public healthcare and education. As a taxpayer, citizens have the right to enjoy the free health care and education, which are part of social welfare.  If citizens lived without the guarantee of health, people who suffer from diseases might fail to get recovered. Especially the infectious diseases cannot be well controlled might cause the society anxiety. Also, without sufficient guidance of teachers, these citizens might misbehave or even commit crimes, posing a threat to other citizens’ security. Therefore, the government should be accountable for citizens’ health care and education to keep society safe and stable.



On the other hand, some people oppose the argument, saying it is waste of tax revenue for government to subsidize healthcare and education of each citizen in society. Instead, the government should give priority to more pressing problems related to social members’ wellbeing, such as soaring crime rate, job opportunity or the shortage of infrastructure, which are requiring financial resources from the government to address.



In conclusion, I think most people should privately insure their health and education. But it is unreasonable to suppose that all citizens can afford it. Therefore, a safety net in the form of a basic free health care and education system must exit for the very poor and the unemployed.



免责声明
澳洲同城网是一个免费的公共信息平台,网站内容由网友自由发布,发布者拥有所发布信息的版权同时承担相应责任; 若所发布信息侵犯了您的权利,请反馈给澳洲同城网,我们核实后将进行相应处理!
官方微信公众号
澳洲同城网官方公众号
微信上也能找工作,找房子?关注万能的同城网官方公众号 localsyd,找到你找不到!
回复

使用道具 举报

147

主题

5

金豆

24

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
24
金豆
5
鲜花
0
主题
147
帖子
244
注册时间
2014-8-16
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-25 00:08:28 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA


多谢 symeteor 兄 给我指出这么多错误。 十分感谢啊。


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

163

主题

8

金豆

23

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
23
金豆
8
鲜花
0
主题
163
帖子
229
注册时间
2014-10-28
沙发
发表于 2012-5-24 19:18:09 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA


1. 字数比较危险,用word统计出来251个。建议多写一点
2.  In my opinion ,加个逗号吧
3. cannot afford it  这里用复数吧?或则干脆直接fee?
4. people who suffer from diseases might fail to get recovered. 虚拟语气,这里应该用would
5. Especially the infectious diseases (which) cannot be well controlled might cause the society anxiety. 不加which的话感觉是双谓语动词了
6.Also, without sufficient guidance of teachers, these citizens might misbehave or even commit crimes, posing a threat to other citizens’ security.  这句写的感觉莫名奇妙。 要议论的是教育,而不是教师
7. it is (a) waste of tax
8. job opportunity 应该用复数
9. But it is unreasonable to suppose that all citizens can afford it. 这个地方的it还是建议明确写出来是什么。而且感觉和后面的那句联系很弱,和后面的写成一句可能更好
10. must exit ,应该是exist吧。


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则




外汇平台
金牌家政
汽车网



















wuliu
你想了解我们吗?
联系我们
关注我们
官方微博 官方Facebook 官方Twitter
微信关注
官方微信公众号 官方微信服务号
官方公众号 客服微信
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表