|
|
7#
发表于 2012-7-20 07:21:46
|
只看该作者
来自： INNA
先推荐LZ看两篇帖子：
http://www.hioz.net/ibbs/viewthread.php?tid=938871
http://www.hioz.net/ibbs/viewthread.php?tid=1003552
引用几段两篇帖子中的内容：
“Having granted you sponsorship, it would be counter-productive for Immigration SA to now agree for you not to settle in South Australia. We hope that you will consider your moral obligation and the intent and goodwill in which sponsorship was granted.“
”reply1:
Your 176 application was given priority processing due to the state sponsorship. I am unable to continue processing your 175 application as it is does not have the appropriate priority.
If you wish to move to another state as you are unable to find work you should speak to the nominating state authorities. As far as DIAC is concerned there is no condition on a 176 visa that you must reside in a particular state.
reply2:
your 175 application will not be processed because your occupation is not in our priority list unless you have sponsorship. You have been granted a 176 - the same class of visa as a 175 - just a different subclass. Both are permanent visas. As far as DIAC is concerned you are free to live wherever you wish in Australia. However it will be courteous of you to negotiate with the state that sponsored you if you are going to leave the state.“
”CO和operator都曾确定地说176只是你承诺了到担保州生活满2年，但176签证本身是没有任何限制的，可以到其它地方生活，也就是说176和175是一样的。可是毕竟176的准签信里写明了担保州的条件，又关系到信誉，所以对于这点持保留态度。“
个人观点：
1.拿了州担保，就要遵守这个moral obligation
2.在这个洲实在混不下去了，176也可以去其他州，但要知会SA，人家还是讲道理的不会看着你走投无路，DIAC方面目前表示没意见。
3.政策和政策解释权掌握在SA和DIAC手里，现在说可以有exception，不代表以后没有变化。所以还是要谨慎。
|
|
支持
反对
