|
|
马上注册，结交更多同城好友，享用更多功能！
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有帐号？立即注册
x
Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared to deal with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, poor children are often deemed to be more competent when they grow up than those who are rich. It appears reasonable. Children who have no extra money for party, travelling, shopping, or other thing of luxury will spend their time on study even taking part-time job to earn money. And those children would try themselves hard to become mature as soon as possible to fit the society and the adult life. So they are always more motivated to get themselves experienced and will work hard to be successful to take more responsibilities for the society when they grow up. It seems that all of these factors drive the poor children to become superior in the society.
However, this point of view is only partly correct. Not all the children who come from poor family are so good enough to take the responsibility of ambition. Some of them maybe have the feeling of inferiority which could retard their progress to become mature. Some maybe are always busy in earning money, neglecting the collecting of knowledge which should take the top priority to a child. On the other hand, a wealthy child who although have much money to waste can be well educated to know the good ways to deal with the money. Those educated wealthy children could spend their money in study or in helping other children who are in poverty. No one could doubt this sort of well trained children can deal with the problem encountered later.
It is obvious that the means by which a child treats the money decide what sort of an adult he will be. And a child's idea about money depends on the education that he got. The key is the education. Both poor children and wealthy children can be successful when they grow up as long as they are all well trained.
|
|
发表于 2010-5-13 23:11:40
支持
反对
楼主
