|
There we go, come on. My second essay is ready.
Q: Giving detailed descriptions of crime by newspaper and television, someone says it would make bad consequence, this kind of media should be restricted. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A:
Nowadays, whether media shuch as newspaper and televidion should sway detailed descriptions of crimes to public or not, brings disscussions around people.
In my opinion, it would be better to put some restricts to the detailed and vivid decsriptions . First of all, the specification of the crime, which is reported by the media, will probably be copied by other people, who are potential to commit crimes, i.e. these detailed contents may become inspirations to the potential offenders. Furthermore, broadcasting of criminal activities from media would make others feel that the society is unsafe and is filled with unstable conditions, thereby affecting the normal lives to everyone. Moreover, when the criminals have finished the jail period, if the descriptions of his illegal experiences have not been shared by publlic , it would be much easier for him or her to face the new life after the punishment.
Howerver, others consider that the whole things of criminal activities should be revealed to all of us. Hence, these would make warning to public and will pull the criminal rate down. Anyhow, these will make deeply impression to people, who have ever lived around the criminals before so that everyone should pay attention to the actions and behaviours of the person , who is just released form the jail.
Though there may be some profits that we will absorb profits from the detailed presentation of public media on the criminal issues. I still prefer that detailed secrets should be protected due to his or her personel human rights. Others should have no rights to reveal it in public . Anyhow these actions have committed to crimes.
[]
|
|