分享学习计划+每天作文练习

最难缠钉子户 · 发表于 2011-2-16 18:25:20

太辛苦你了，真不好意思
Thanks for your time.

最难缠钉子户 · 发表于 2011-2-17 00:40:02

看老兄的文章开始有种看Economist的感觉了。

最难缠钉子户 · 发表于 2011-2-17 03:17:44

老兄字写太多了吧。。。

0c1b64t44d · 发表于 2011-2-17 12:48:07

多谢指正，原来我一直错觉+zation是英式

最难缠钉子户 · 发表于 2011-2-17 18:37:57

+sation是英式。最好的方法就是写在word里，它认为拼写错误的就是英式的。

最难缠钉子户 · 发表于 2011-2-18 01:44:45

The thirty-fourth essay

Some people think it is the responsibility for government to ensure that people have healthy lifestyles. Others think people should have a free for their own lifestyles decisions. Discuss both and give your own opinion.

Answer:

Currently, as healthy lifestyle have been publicised frequently by some governments, some people argue that people have freedom to decide their own lifestyles. In my view, health always plays vital role in people's lives, for the sake of improving, governments should introduce healthy lifestyles, whereas individuals should respond actively.

Indeed, people of course have rights to decide their lifestyle. But people choose unhealthy lifestyles such as excessive smoking, excessive drinking and sedentary lifestyle are irresponsible for themselves, their households and even societies. Because they are impairing their body, so they have high rate to sicken. Subsequently, when they have sickened, that could disturb their family members to spend time and money to take care of them. Additionally, health care systems will be wasted if they expend funds to supply these people. Contrarily, people who keep healthy lifestyles would have lower risk of illness than them. As people have been increasingly wealthy nowadays, owning healthy body is a sort of happiness.

Certainly, governments always hope their citizens healthy. Not only would healthy citizenry contribute productivity and various taxes to nations, but also they relieve the strain to the resources of health care systems. For the benefit of improving public health, governments introduce some healthy lifestyles like walking after meal and doing exercise properly. However, those are not compulsory policies but well-meant admonitions because governments have no rights to meddle in people's lives.

Personally, people should be responsible for themselves, families and societies. Therefore, they should receive the governments' well-meant admonitions and attempt to adjust themselves to healthy lifestyles.

Summarily, people wish their body healthy as governments wish. Although they have rights to choose their lifestyle, while healthy lifestyles governments publicised are not compulsory. So they should receive governments' well-meant admonitions for the sake of keep health.

最难缠钉子户 · 发表于 2011-2-18 07:28:21

The thirty-fifth essay

Some people believe that charity organisations should give the aid to those in great needs, wherever they lives, some people think that charity organisations should concentrate on helping people who lives in their own country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Answer:

As humanitarianism has high developed in this day and age, charity organisations have relieved a vast deal of people of poverty and misery. However, some people argue that charity organisations should focus on help domestic people instead of the entire human. In my view, humanitarianism as well as charity is a soul beyond national boundaries.

Charity means aiding people who live in misery and poverty. Indeed, some people might argue that too many domestic people need help, while charity institutions' funds are quite limited. Likewise, charity funds might basically depend on native people's donation, so those should be used on native people. That seems reasonable, but humanitarianism and charity are souls and aim to humankind. If those just focus on native people, so those will be lost their meaning and finally just become sort of social welfare.

However, the opponents believe that charity organisations should save people in great needs wherever they are. As a matter of fact, in many countries, charity institutions have helped numerous people in great needs. For instance, some charity organisations support accommodation to displaced persons who suffered disaster or persecution whether they are foreigner. In addition, many of international people who are suffering starvation, famine and plague have been aided by charity institutions from different countries. The global village has made people around the world as a big family in this day and age, thus people should help for every family member's difficulty.

Summarily, in my view, although charity organisations aid all the people could spend some native persons' donation, but numerous people would be save which is the most important things because the humanitarianism and the global village have associate humankind together.

d5l0ir5w3 · 发表于 2011-2-18 13:11:49

楼主的第33篇是关于城市规划，或者说就是城市化的一个方面。在economist上作了些搜索，却不尽人意，干脆自己裸写了，看看真实水平。

请教：Beijing eventually fulfilled the environmental requirement that having air cleanness at certain level to hold Olympic Games in 2008 by forcing industries moved to suburban. 此处that having air cleanness at certain level用法对吗？

题目：

提纲：
正方2个观点——改善环境，提供更多工作机会；反方1个观点——增加负担

正文：
Across the world urbanisation is something to be very controversial, not least it lets industries and businesses move out of metropolitan and into rural region. All in all to be as clear as crystal, I am side with that such reform overcomes the frictions it could bring up with.

The basic concept sounds simple enough: that large city should be designated for people's living regard of their climate environment, job opportunity and cost of living. First of all, it is well known that industries play a crucial role on environment affecting and climate changing, without debating the consequences of those chemical pollutants emit and noises generate but giving an actual example, Beijing eventually fulfilled the environmental requirement that having air cleanness at certain level to hold Olympic Games in 2008 by forcing industries moved to suburban. Furthermore, encouraging business organisations gather together indeed helps resources of society to be relocated and reconfigured, with closer cooperations and ampler competitions, more job opportunities create.

Admittedly, advance comes with sting. Living cost begin to boost while firms are moving into regional area, not only should the cost show on travelling bill and time spending, but also it comes up with other social issues especially children's education, those who are working out side of city barely have much time to be with their children. Viewed from this perspective policymakers need to focus on improving traffic condition and providing relevant school facilities such as after-school care.

The trend that more industries and businesses move to district area is almost certain to continue, despite of the negativities, both society and individual will continuously benefit from it.

[]

mk9s2w2r1i · 发表于 2011-2-18 19:58:00

2011年第二次回来探亲
我最近已经把英语忘掉了，嘿嘿，走路上看见啥字母串都想用法语来拼！

最难缠钉子户 · 发表于 2011-2-18 23:00:28

感觉越接近过年越是忙不过来，实在是没法子坚持一天一篇了。

The thirty-sixth essay

Air transport is increasingly used to export fruit and vegetables to some countries where cannot be grown or out of season. Some people think it is not justified. To what extent do you agree?

Answer:

As transportation technologies are developing rapidly in this day and age, increasing aeroplanes are used for fruit and vegetable exports to some countries where cannot be grown or out of season, whereas some people believe it is unjustified. In my view, fruit and vegetable exports by airfreight is an unavoidable development.

Indeed, it seems fruit and vegetable exports by airfreight that is unjustified to some extent. As a matter of fact, its overhead cost is higher than other export ways. Subsequently, the high costs could cause those goods prices increase as well. Finally, customers who live in the countries imported those fruit and vegetables have to pay not only those goods prices themselves but also extra high transport costs they included. Additionally, exporting by aeroplanes also augment flights, which will extra consume natural resources as well as cause air pollution and noise disturbing citizens who live near the airports.

However, both countries which import and export fruit and vegetables will benefit from airfreight. More precisely, in terms of export, countries will gain huge profits from that. Unlike other goods, fruit and vegetables cannot be stored for a long time. Thus airfreight becomes a proper way to transport those thereby ensuring them fresh. That allows countries to sale those fresh fruit and vegetables to other countries. Because these goods cannot be grown or out of season in those countries, so they might be sold expensively. Likewise, people who live in those countries are enabled to enrich their lives by those foods. Now, they can eat some foods which they have never seen before or out of season.

Summarily, In my view, although export fruit and vegetables by aeroplanes might be unjustified to some extent, but that enriches people's lives and brings huge profits to countries.

[雅思杂谈] 分享学习计划+每天作文练习

个人中心