|
61#
楼主 |
发表于 2012-4-26 00:39:41
|
只看该作者
来自: INNA
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century. Some people think that preventing these wild animals from dying out is a waste of resource. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
In recent years, the living area of humankind is expanding fast, since the global population growing rapidly. In relative terms, the territory of wildlife's activities has narrowed dramatically. In this case, some people try to save them because wildlife was being threatened. Although conventional wisdom has it that spend abundant money and resources on saving wild animals from dying is worthless, the reality of the situation is often far more complicated than that.
Firstly, wildlife protection is to protect precious natural resources and it is very important. In any event, we have to remain species diversity as every one of them is playing a key role in the food chain. Moreover, there are imitating interactions amongst different species and the dying out of a particular species will definitely influence on survival of others. What is obvious is that human finally could be the victim. Consequently, saving the rare wild animals has a great value.
Secondly, mankind has obligations to save wild animals, not only because we cut down forests, thereby expanding the areas and it lead to environmental destruction at the same time, which this kind of action seriously affect the sustainable living environment of wildlife, but also due to hunting them on purpose.
Last but not least, the present generation of people should think about the legacy, which will be inherited by descendants. In fact, the unspoiled environment, and the existence of wild animals is one of the most essential contributions to the future generations of people.
To sum up, owing to we take many factors into consideration, such as: the future of humanity, the importance of maintaining species diversity, and our duties, I am convinced that we ought to protect wild animals as much as possible.
[]
x
|
|