公告:为给大家更好的使用体验,同城网今日将系统升级,页面可能会出现不稳定状态,由此给您带来的不便,敬请谅解!
升级时间:2016-7-24 11:00 -- 2016-7-24 15:00

澳洲同城网

楼主: psikd7r0l5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[雅思杂谈] 作文累积贴,求批

[复制链接]

139

主题

10

金豆

24

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
24
金豆
10
鲜花
0
主题
139
帖子
235
注册时间
2015-2-1
61#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-26 00:39:41 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA







Wild animals have no place in the 21st century. Some people think that preventing these wild animals from dying out is a waste of resource. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.


In recent years, the living area of humankind is expanding fast, since the global population growing rapidly. In relative terms, the territory of wildlife's activities has narrowed dramatically. In this case, some people try to save them because wildlife was being threatened. Although conventional wisdom has it that spend abundant money and resources on saving wild animals from dying is worthless, the reality of the situation is often far more complicated than that.

Firstly, wildlife protection is to protect precious natural resources and it is very important. In any event, we have to remain species diversity as every one of them is playing a key role in the food chain. Moreover, there are imitating interactions amongst different species and the dying out of a particular species will definitely influence on survival of others. What is obvious is that human finally could be the victim. Consequently, saving the rare wild animals has a great value.

Secondly, mankind has obligations to save wild animals, not only because we cut down forests, thereby expanding the areas and it lead to environmental destruction at the same time, which this kind of action seriously affect the sustainable living environment of wildlife, but also due to hunting them on purpose.

Last but not least, the present generation of people should think about the legacy, which will be inherited by descendants. In fact, the unspoiled environment, and the existence of wild animals is one of the most essential contributions to the future generations of people.

To sum up, owing to we take many factors into consideration, such as: the future of humanity, the importance of maintaining species diversity, and our duties, I am convinced that we ought to protect wild animals as much as possible.

[]


x


官方微信公众号
澳洲同城网官方公众号
微信上也能找工作,找房子?关注万能的同城网官方公众号 localsyd,找到你找不到!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

139

主题

10

金豆

24

积分

Lv1

Rank: 1

性别
保密
积分
24
金豆
10
鲜花
0
主题
139
帖子
235
注册时间
2015-2-1
62#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-26 12:02:17 | 只看该作者 来自: INNA


Some people believe that in order to give opportunities to new generation companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire. Do you agree or disagree? Give your reasons and personal experience.



In present-day society, as the global recession continues, it becomes harder for the graduated students to find a suitable job. Some people claim that granting that elders retire earlier, the new generation would obtain more opportunities. To my mind, however, I do not wholly agree with it.

On the one hand, it is true that youngsters can take advantage of the circumstance that senior employees quit their job earlier. Obviously, the company will gain more headcount to hire younger employees. That is to say, junior candidates will access to more opportunities to get an offer and the competitions amongst them will be less intense. Simultaneously, as the high level colleagues’ leaving, the youngster who had hired by the company already will promote to senior level. As a result, the salary and individual welfare thus be increased. Hence, it is undeniable that the younger generation does take advantage of elder’s early retirement.

On the other hand, some serious problems occur when companies encourage high level employees to leave. Even though the company will have a chance to hire some new employees who do not need pay big salaries for, thereby reducing labor cost, but companies still lose abundant money on dismissal wage. Besides, the company has to face the risk of promoting junior staffs because they do not have rich relevant experiences and nobody knows whether they can do the same excellent job as their ex-colleagues or not. Notably, it is too late to find a qualified mentor for the new heads because the perfect teachers had left already.

Given the above argument, it is reasonable to conclude that advantages and disadvantages are coexisting when companies encourage senior employees to take early retirement. Consequently, I am convinced that the company should take into serious consideration before taking the action.


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则




外汇平台
金牌家政
汽车网



















wuliu
你想了解我们吗?
联系我们
关注我们
官方微博 官方Facebook 官方Twitter
微信关注
官方微信公众号 官方微信服务号
官方公众号 客服微信
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表