泽马浪人
发表于 2010-6-3 23:54:41
WOW，很鼓舞人心哈，滴答上的专家给了我６．５分．
要改进的地方还很多，语法，长句（复杂句），内容．．．
anyway, keep moving, toward the target!
http://i.tigtag.com/spoken.php?d ... ew&spokenid=438
tbyg1865
发表于 2010-6-4 09:45:07
与君共勉……
泽马浪人
发表于 2010-6-4 19:44:01
天下还有免费的午餐，哈哈！
泽马浪人
发表于 2010-6-5 05:50:44
剑3，test 2, reading
错7
1个多写了climate (temperate climate)
2个因为单词不认得的误解 (sub-tropical, ritual)
2个疏忽，大意理解上的偏差，和完全漏掉了已经勾出的主题句
还有两个算是检查不仔细吧，一个犹豫再三还是把正确的改错了，还有一个犹豫再三还是没把正确的写上去（看来不能受固有思维的束缚，觉得同样的答案不应该出现两次）
[]
泽马浪人
发表于 2010-6-5 15:14:57
another try of speaking
http://i.tigtag.com/spoken.php?d ... ew&spokenid=450
泽马浪人
发表于 2010-6-5 22:36:01
剑3, test 2, writing task 2
When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
With the fast development of modern technology, the concerns over the fading-away of the traditional skills and life style have risen. More and more people argue that we should try the best to protect and keep them alive. However leaving the decision to the history may be a better choice.
It’s true that those conventional skills and old life style have been lasting for centuries. To some extent, they have become part of our culture and hard to abandon. Some of them, for example travelling by horse wagon, compared with the modern techniques, such as car, are more environment-friendly. In addition, some of the unique skills, like those in arts, are not replaceable by machine.
Despite of all the mentioned advantages, we cannot deny their negative effects. Traditional skills and way of life are usually slow. They’re time consuming and not cost –effective. That’s the key reason why they cannot beat the new technology in the competition. The history tells us that advanced technology drives away the elementary one is a natural process. Iron tools replaced the stone one; architecture made people move from the cave to house; with paper, we don’t need to write on leaves anymore; telephone facilitate the live talk with a person thousands miles away. The replacement is a fate and not avoidable. In another word, this is the civilization where only stronger survives.
To conclude the debate, I believe that history will make the right choice. Only those that stand the test of time can escape the fate of dying out.
[]
不丹不丹不
发表于 2010-6-6 00:49:17
只看了第一段，提点意见，个人看法
fast可以用rapid代替
more and more可以用一个词代替，我忘记是什么词了囧，昨天刚在十天写作看到的，在写作中more and more显得略微松散，请参考十天写作day3词汇替代
ntor8534
发表于 2010-6-6 01:22:33
听过了，感觉还不错啊，可能有点生硬有点紧张...不过，肯定说得比我连贯比我有条理的多...
发觉楼主的一些短语重用了几次...however\several month later
再次感叹口语看考官的，不过这个是在家多次练习的结果，考场发挥不知道如何
永不言弃
发表于 2010-6-6 06:56:30
sub表示下 tropical热带都认识，这时候就看词根猜词的技术了
泽马浪人
发表于 2010-6-6 12:35:44
谢谢！你说的是《十天突破雅思写作》这本书吗？
页:
1
2
3
4
5
[6]
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15