uneea45410
发表于 2012-12-15 14:22:34
你说的是ack邮件里附件IMMI Acknowledgement of Valid Application Received.pdf么？
头越来越大
发表于 2012-12-15 16:30:03
mark~！
cnbai0g8z6
发表于 2012-12-16 00:22:28
请问EA的certify一定要是国内的律师或者公证处吗？
egqeu283
发表于 2012-12-16 08:02:38
Dear Sir,
Thank you for your advice.
Clearly a certifier needs to be legally operating 'within his
jurisdiction' - this is stated at pages 5/6 of the MSA Booklet. If for
example a JP has been authorised in the state of QLD, then that does not
necessarily mean that he is authorised to operate all over the world.
I see no reason why a Chinese licensed lawyer will not be eligible for
certifying documents as copies of the original if they are in China -
but usually such copies take the form of a notarised version done by the
local Notary Office.
g0xhyuuh0j
发表于 2012-12-16 20:01:22
意思就是国内律师是可以certify的，是吧？
hussau17uo
发表于 2012-12-17 03:59:23
ACS那里我已经打电话去确认过了，他们接受the documents certified by the Australian Lawyer outside Australia.
hussau17uo
发表于 2012-12-17 15:41:48
EA也回我邮件了，EA的说法是，在境外不行，当文件带回境内certify是可以的，但如果有朋友不是很急的话，我可以带回澳洲certify再邮寄回中国给你们，但是说实话EA也不会去查这个到底是在哪里certify的。下附EA回复：
Dear Mr Cao,
thank you for your enquiry.
We would not accept copies that you have certified in China in your quality of NSW Solicitor as you would be operating outside of your jurisdiction.
However, if you are the holder of a similar Chinese status, then you could certify the copies in China.
Copies certified by yourself in Australia would be suitable. Note however that you would have to see the original document to be able to certify the copies (the original document, not a notarised copy and not a scanned copy of the document that you could receive per email).
你看我look你
发表于 2012-12-17 22:23:51
非常感谢。
感谢44楼和47楼，两位贴出的信件内容说明在瓷国境内时瓷国律师有法律权限，原因也确实如44楼信件中所言，没有理由证明其无权限，呵呵
zyjkp
发表于 2012-12-18 05:35:38
TRA应该也接受的吧。
hussau17uo
发表于 2012-12-18 13:51:24
Vetassess是接受的，TRA很多职业还是让vet评的，所以vet接受就ok了。
[]
页:
1
2
3
4
[5]
6
7
8
9
10
11
12