lopyappeaph
发表于 2011-3-7 01:52:13
很早就看你的帖子，加油，兄弟，
最难缠钉子户
发表于 2011-3-7 08:25:24
The fifty-fourth essay
Some people think that politicians have the greatest influence on the world. Other people, however, believe that scientists have the greatest influence. Discuss both of the views and give your opinion.
Answer:
As human society has developed rapidly in this day and ages, which groups of people have the greatest influence on the world has become a frequent topic of discussion. Some people believe those are politicians whereas others think those are scientists.
Admittedly, politicians' decisions might influence the world greatly. More precisely, in particular some advanced countries, politicians who are peace-loving or aggressive might decide the world in peace or in war. That is best illustrated with the example of Fascism. Hitler was a cruel leader and his expansionist policy made the Second World War erupted. As a consequence, the trauma of the war has extended from that generation to current generation and might be continuing in many of countries. By contrast, some peace-loving politicians might benefit the world in whole. For instance, Chinese leader DengXiaoping opened Chinese door in 1979. Consequently, not only might majority of countries benefit from that policy because of abundant Chinese natural and human resources, but also that has expanded Chinese's outlook and allowed them travelling to foreign countries for tour or business.
However, the world changes are also contributed by scientists a lot. Exactly, the people on this planet have hugely benefited from scientists' inventions. For example, the lamps make evening not dark any more; the aeroplanes enable people travelling around world; the spaceships send people out of space. As a matter of fact, almost every inventions created by scientists might bring the world to the new era. Currently, the technological development is equal to the strength and status of a nation in the world. In other words, scientists have played a vital role in national development, even world development.
Summarily, politicians and scientists are all greatly influence the world. Personally, it is hardly to compare both of them which have more influence on the world.
最难缠钉子户
发表于 2011-3-7 08:42:52
多谢鼓励
最难缠钉子户
发表于 2011-3-7 14:38:06
The fifty-fifth is report
Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century. The map below shows the development of the village.
Answer:
Chorleywood is a village adjacent to London and its population has increased stably since the middle of the nineteenth century. The map describes the development of the village from 1868 to 1994.
According to the map, the development of Chorleywood experienced four stages. More precisely, initially, from 1868 to 1883, Chorleywood just has a small area and only two main roads were close to the village. After that, the village extended southward and the size of the new area almost doubled of initial village from 1883 to 1922. In this period, a railway has been built in 1909 and a railway station (Chorleywood Station) has been established in the village centre. Over the third period (1922 - 1970), the village expanded along with the south of railway. Finally, between 1970 and 1994, the new area was built at east of the village. In 1970, a motorway was accomplished cross the new area and connected to the northern main road.
Therefore, it can be clearly seen from the map that the area of Chorleywood increased stably and its means of transportation developed from 1868 to 1994.
最难缠钉子户
发表于 2011-3-7 16:38:09
惨不忍睹我的口语啊。。。
The fifty-sixth essay
Nowadays, distance-learning programs are such common things for us (the study material by post, by Internet), but some people argue that courses can never be taken as good as those by attending in a college or university in person. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Answer:
As human technology has developed rapidly in this day and age,students can get study material via distance-learning programs such as email, Internet and so on. Subsequently,some people discuss that those courses are not better than lectures in colleges and universities.
Indeed, distance-learning programs obviously has inherent advantages against traditional lectures in colleges and universities. More precisely, teachers and students can teach and study theoretically everywhere every time through Internet or email. By that, teachers can put their study material on Internet, whereas students can learn and review the courses after school. Furthermore, students always could ask their tutors questions about courses via email when they at home, while tutors can also give them response by the same way. However, even though distance education is quite convenient, but it might not replace traditional lecture currently.
Likewise, traditional education plays an important role in students' education yet as well. First and foremost, traditional lecture would endue students with not only academic knowledge itself but also social experience. Because students can communicate with their classmates when they at school. Additionally, universities' and colleges' disciplines might regulate students thereby ensuring them going to school. In contrast, distance education might not enforce students to study at such important ages. Consequently, they might stop learning but do other things they interested.
Summarily, in my view, it is hardly to compare which pedagogical methodology is better, distance education or traditional education. Because both two methodologies all have numbers of advantages and all play important roles in students' education.
okx1u3ckd
发表于 2011-3-7 23:43:36
闪动，19号你在哪考试？上海？
bsei4443
发表于 2011-3-8 11:41:59
As human technology has developed [->has been developing/is developing] rapidly in this day and age,students can get study material via distance-learning programs such as email, Internet and so on. Subsequently[->However],some people discuss[->argue.discuss怪怪的] that those courses are not better than lectures in colleges and universities.
Indeed, distance-learning programs obviously has[->have] inherent advantages against traditional lectures in colleges and universities. More precisely, teachers and students can teach and study theoretically[->这句话不通，直接说teachers teach students theories就可以了吧？] everywhere every time[->anywhere and anytime] through Internet or email. By that, teachers can put their study[->course] material on Internet, whereas students can learn and review the courses after school. Furthermore, students always could[->could easily] ask their tutors questions about courses via email when they at home, while tutors can also give them response by[->in] the same way. However, even though distance education is quite convenient, but [删掉] it might not replace traditional lecture currently.
Likewise, traditional education plays an important role in students' education[->] yet[->yet含否定意思，用still更好] as well. First and foremost, traditional lecture would endue students with not only academic knowledge itself but also social experience. Because[->because应该带从句，而不是另起一句] students can communicate with their classmates when they at school. Additionally, universities' and colleges' disciplines might regulate students thereby ensuring them going to school. In contrast, distance education might not enforce students to study at such important ages. Consequently, they might stop learning but[->and] do other things they interested .
Summarily, in my view, it is hardly[->hard] to compare[->determine] which pedagogical methodology is better, distance education or traditional education. Because[->because 同理应该带从句，而不是另起一句] both two[删掉] methodologies all[删掉] have numbers of advantages and all[->both] play important roles in students' education.
[]
最难缠钉子户
发表于 2011-3-8 20:18:41
茉莉姐^_^，我19号在上海考试，口语提前了，17或18号。现在拼命搞口语ing...
最难缠钉子户
发表于 2011-3-9 07:22:33
太及时了，好多我都是习惯性错误了，十分感谢
yl48hujkgc
发表于 2011-3-9 09:38:28
赞成楼主的坚持！！非常佩服！！~~
希望楼主继续坚持下去！！！